September 2026 Benchmark Results
NoteGPT AI Humanizer
AI humanizer included in the September 2026 AI Humanizer Benchmark.
NoteGPT AI Humanizer wasn't part of the October 2026 cycle. These are its September 2026 results. See the current leaderboard for the latest rankings.
Scorecard
By detector
How NoteGPT AI Humanizer performs against each detector we test.
| Detector | Score | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| Turnitin | 22.1 | 22% |
| GPTZero | 19.6 | 20% |
| Originality.ai | 14.3 | 14% |
| Winston AI | 17.8 | 18% |
By writing category
Performance across the categories of writing we score separately.
| Category | Score |
|---|---|
| SEO content | 49.8 |
| Marketing copy | 48.5 |
| Students | 52.4 |
| Essays | 58.9 |
| Academic writing | 55.1 |
At a glance
NoteGPT AI Humanizer ranks seventh of seven with an overall score of 51.27, 18.91 points behind Netus AI. GPTHuman remains the top-ranked AI humanizer in the September 2026 leaderboard at 88.28. NoteGPT's scorecard is unusually divided: readability reaches 86.5 and meaning preservation 81.2, but detector bypass falls to 18.4.
What it does well
The tool preserves readable prose better than its final ranking suggests. Its 86.5 readability score is second only to GPTHuman in this benchmark, while its 81.2 meaning score is also competitive with several higher-ranked tools. The output can therefore look clean even when it fails the detector objective.
Why it ranks last
Detector performance is the decisive weakness. NoteGPT scores 19.6 against GPTZero, 17.8 against Winston AI and 14.3 against Originality.ai, ranking seventh on each direct result. It also ranks seventh in all five active writing categories, with scores from 48.5 for marketing copy to 58.9 for essays.
Bottom line
NoteGPT AI Humanizer may improve surface readability, but the September results do not support it as a reliable detector-bypass tool. It is the clearest example in this benchmark of fluent output and successful humanization being two different things.
Where it performed best
The benchmark case for NoteGPT AI Humanizer
The result shows a pronounced split between writing quality and detector performance.
Strongest core measure
Readability was its strongest core result at 86.5.
Meaning preservation
Its meaning score of 81.2 was substantially stronger than its overall ranking suggests.
Best writing category
Essays produced its highest category score at 58.9.
Clear trade-off
The benchmark separates readable rewriting from successful detector bypass; NoteGPT performed far better on the former.
Measured limitations
Where the result needs context
Detector bypass was the decisive weakness in this benchmark cycle.
Detector bypass
The 18.4 bypass score was the lowest in the seven-tool field.
Detector rankings
Ranked #7 against GPTZero (19.6), Winston AI (17.8) and Originality.ai (14.3).
Applied penalties
Its reported score includes the benchmark’s largest residual AI-pattern penalty, plus a rerun-variance penalty.
Point-in-time evidence
The findings describe one fixed September 2026 cycle and cannot guarantee the outcome for an individual document.
Compare NoteGPT AI Humanizer
Head-to-head benchmark pages
See how its writing-quality strengths compare with tools that achieved higher bypass results.
Related research
See how performance changes under different tests
Arena Labs examines questions that the main leaderboard does not answer on its own.