October 2026 Benchmark Results
WriteHuman
October’s runner-up at 75.6 overall, with 87.1 for detector bypass, 73.8 for meaning preservation and 69.2 for readability.
Scorecard
By detector
How WriteHuman performs against each detector we test.
| Detector | Score | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| Pangram | 82.4 | 82% |
| GPTZero | 89.6 | 90% |
| Originality.ai | 88.9 | 89% |
| Copyleaks | 86.3 | 86% |
| ZeroGPT | 88.4 | 88% |
At a glance
WriteHuman is the October runner-up, 12.3 points behind GPTHuman and 1.8 points ahead of Undetectable.ai. Its strongest published component is detector bypass at 87.1.
Detector results
WriteHuman places third on all five detector-specific rankings. Its scores range from 82.4 against Pangram to 89.6 against GPTZero, with 88.9 for Originality.ai, 86.3 for Copyleaks and 88.4 for ZeroGPT.
The trade-off
The October table reports 73.8 for meaning preservation and 69.2 for readability. Those writing-quality scores are lower than its detector-bypass result, so the profile is stronger on detector performance than on the two published quality measures.
Bottom line
WriteHuman is the clearest second-place choice in the October overall table. Its detector results are the strongest part of the case, while meaning and readability should be weighed separately for writing where quality matters most.
October 2026 results
The benchmark case for WriteHuman
The current cycle places WriteHuman second overall, supported by third-place results across all five reported detectors.
Overall: 75.6
Ranked #2 of 10 tools, 1.8 points ahead of third place.
Detector bypass: 87.1
The third-highest detector-bypass result in the October overall table.
Meaning: 73.8
The published October score for meaning preservation.
Readability: 69.2
The published October readability score.
Related research
Explore Humanizer Arena research
See separate experiments and the site methodology for additional context.